Board of Inquiry, Randall Hoadley vs. AWMA Executive Board
The AWMA BOI Committee conducted a call on Tuesday, March 19, 2025, to examine the relevance of the BOI Randall Hoadley vs 8 AWMA Executive Board Members. The Committee determined that the charges lacked relevance regarding the delivery/mailing of the 8 BOIs by Andy Dietz, which failed to comply with AWMA Bylaws:
“SECTION 3. DISCIPLINE
c. The Secretary shall send one (1) copy of the charges to the accused member by certified mail not more than thirty (30) days after receipt”.
Furthermore, upon reviewing the evidence, we concluded that the meeting in question was held in accordance with AWMA Bylaws, thereby also rendering the charges irrelevant.
“(ii) A meeting of the Executive Board shall be called by the AWMA Secretary upon receipt of a petition signed by two-thirds (2/3) of the members of the Executive Board.
(iii) Executive Board members shall be given written notice at least thirty (30) days prior to any meeting”.
Moreover, the signatures of 8 AWMA Executive Board Members exceeded the necessary 2/3 threshold, thus authorizing the AWMA Secretary to convene an AWMA Executive Board meeting.
Sincerely,
The AWMA Board of Inquiry Committee.